Anselmo della Pusterla
Anselmo della Pusterla served as the Archbishop of Milan from 1126 until his deposition in 1135. He is known for his opposition to the papacy in favor of an imperialist policy that aimed to preserve the traditional freedoms of the Ambrosian diocese, which led to conflict with the citizens of Milan and a schism within the church.
Key Facts
- ›Archbishop of Milan (as Anselm V) from June 30, 1126, to early 1135.
- ›Studied in France at Paris, Tours (1107), and Laon under Anselm (1109).
- ›Opposed the papacy, advocating for imperialist policies to protect the Ambrosian diocese's freedoms.
- ›His policies created a schism in the Milanese church and alienated him from the citizens.
- ›Deposed in early 1135 (some sources cite 1133).
- ›Died on August 14, 1136, and was buried in the Lateran in Rome.
- Preservation of Traditional Freedoms of the Ambrosian Diocese Through Imperialist Policy
About Anselmo della Pusterla
Anselmo della Pusterla was the Archbishop of Milan, known as Anselm V, during a tumultuous period in the 12th century. His tenure, from June 30, 1126, to his deposition in early 1135, was marked by significant conflict arising from his political and ecclesiastical policies.
Life and Historical Context
Like many young men from Milan of his era, Anselm undertook his education abroad, studying in France. He attended institutions in Paris and Tours in 1107, and later studied under the notable scholar Anselm at Laon in 1109. This European educational experience likely shaped his broader perspective on church and state relations.
Conflict and Deposition
Upon becoming Archbishop of Milan, Anselm adopted a strong imperialist policy. His primary aim was to safeguard the traditional freedoms of the Ambrosian diocese, which often meant aligning with imperial interests against papal authority. This stance placed him in direct opposition to the citizens of Milan, who were fervent opponents of the emperor. The resulting friction led to a schism within the church in Milan. Consequently, Anselm found himself deposed from his archiepiscopal office in early 1135, although some historical sources place this event in 1133. Following his deposition, he traveled to Rome, where he died on August 14, 1136, and was buried in the Lateran basilica.
Source: Wikipedia ↗
Frequently Asked Questions
When was Anselmo della Pusterla Archbishop of Milan?
Anselmo della Pusterla served as the Archbishop of Milan, under the regnal name Anselm V, from June 30, 1126, until his deposition early in 1135.
What was Anselmo della Pusterla's stance on the papacy?
As archbishop, Anselm della Pusterla opposed the papacy, advocating for an imperialist policy. This policy was intended to preserve the traditional freedoms of the Ambrosian diocese.
Why did Anselmo della Pusterla come into conflict with the citizens of Milan?
His opposition to the papacy in favor of imperialist policies put him at odds with the citizens of Milan, who were staunch opponents of the emperor. This led to a schism within the church in Milan.
When and where did Anselmo della Pusterla die?
Anselmo della Pusterla died on August 14, 1136. He died in Rome, where he was also buried in the Lateran.
Related Archbishops
Alfonso Litta
Alfonso Litta was an Italian nobleman, Cardinal, and Archbishop of Milan from 1652 to 1679. He was known for his administrative roles in the Papal States and his efforts to reform the Archdiocese of Milan, including convening synods and making pastoral visits. Despite facing opposition and making enemies, he was eventually elevated to the rank of Cardinal.
Ariberto da Intimiano
Ariberto da Intimiano served as the Archbishop of Milan from 1018 to 1045. He was a significant political figure in 11th-century Italy, instrumental in consolidating imperial authority and engaging in complex negotiations with both German emperors and Italian magnates. His tenure was marked by both diplomatic successes and conflicts with the lesser nobility and the metropolitan of Ravenna.
Bartolomeo Carlo Romilli
Bartolomeo Carlo Romilli served as the Archbishop of Milan from 1847 to 1859. His appointment was significant as it marked the return of an Italian prelate to lead the archdiocese after an Austrian one, a move welcomed by a populace desiring independence.